> Or if the company decides to refuse doing a recall because the cost of recall doesn't equal or exceed its liability, well, too bad. Is that wrong (I think th

> Or if the company decides to refuse doing a recall because the cost of recall doesn't equal or exceed its liability, well, too bad. Is that wrong (I think that's what you're implying)? I'm serious. More money can be used to make things safer, but there's a point where the benefits become marginal compared to the costs.