3 ms·
They've been pretty good about accepting PRs to support any ad network from what I've heard: https://github.com/ampproject/amphtml/pulls?utf8=%E2%9C%93&q=is%3Ap
by gibrown 10y ago
They've been pretty good about accepting PRs to support any ad network from what I've heard: https://github.com/ampproject/amphtml/pulls?utf8=%E2%9C%93&q=is%3Apr%20is%3Aclosed%20amp-ad%20 https://github.com/ampproject/amphtml/pulls?utf8=%E2%9C%93&q...
- kuschku 10y agoYes, just as ABP has been good about accepting PRs to add "unobtrusive ads" - until they started demanding money. NEVER give this power to a central authority that's not democratically controlled. And yet, some people still do that mistake.
- gibrown 10y agoI agree that their current process should become more democratic, and that this is a real concern. There is also benefit in moving quickly to try and solve a real problem and prove that this approach will work. I'm still cautiously optimistic.
- skybrian 10y agoAll open source projects have some kind of "central control" in the sense that they can accept or reject pull requests and define what the official version is. But you can fork them, so it should be okay, right?
- kuschku 10y agoExactly, but I can’t fork AMP – as Google decides which fork gets preferred treatment by them