4 ms·
The study you're referencing assumed that the order in which the parolees appeared was random, which turned out not to be the case. More info here: https://new
by hobbyjogger 10y ago
The study you're referencing assumed that the order in which the parolees appeared was random, which turned out not to be the case. More info here:
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=12463053 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=12463053
- anexprogrammer 10y agoHadn't been aware of that before. Rather undermines the conclusions. Thanks.