4 ms·

Just because you can't create, that doesn't discredit criticisms.

• blowski 10y ago
  Agreed, up to a point. Many film critics have never been directors or actors, and that doesn't detract from their criticisms. But the OP is releasing this for free, and that helps other people. By crapping on their project with random, unfounded opinions, we discourage them from open sourcing their other code, and that makes the world a worse place. If you don't like an open source project and it's existence isn't doing the world any harm, then just be quiet and move on - or even better, release your own better version.
  • Semiapies 10y ago
    OP also submitted this link to a discussion site where people don't believe criticism is forbidden or may only be given on the submitter's terms.
    • blowski 10y ago
      Of course criticism is not forbidden - if it was, then I would be flagging these comments for deletion. Instead, I am criticising your comments, and that is also not forbidden nor only allowed on your terms. It works both ways.
      • Semiapies 10y ago
        You aren't making any criticisms, you're just throwing out a boilerplate demand for people not to harsh anyone's vibe by criticizing anything released open source. (Lest the OP figure out a way to release simple CSS classes in a proprietary format, I guess.) The criticisms aren't particularly "random" or "unfounded", they're on-point: this isn't something that "helps" much, it's just some CSS to make some basic, pointlessly distracting animations.