3 ms·
>it’s difficult to create a distinction between allowing a photograph of a nude child in one instance and not others. I'm assuming this is just PR, but if not,
by r_smart 10y ago
>it’s difficult to create a distinction between allowing a photograph of a nude child in one instance and not others.
I'm assuming this is just PR, but if not, what a dumb statement. I'm sure there are cases where this might be true, but given the photograph we're talking about, give me a break. You really can't create a distinction between this and most other nude photos?
Unless she meant algorithmically. I could see that being a problem.
- lloyd-christmas 10y ago> Unless she meant algorithmically. I could see that being a problem. "The posts would have been reported by a user to Facebook’s community standards team, who would then have made the decision to remove them, rather than being removed automatically by algorithm."
- vidarh 10y agoAnd that justifies the initial removals. It does not justify not having an effective appeals method to someone who isn't just blindly applying their rules, and a means of white-listing things that have been approved once. This is not a new problem that they've never been exposed to before.