4 ms·
People complaining because it's a famous award winning photograph but still gets treated like every other photograph with nude kids in it? I can just imagine t
by mickmock 10y ago
People complaining because it's a famous award winning photograph but still gets treated like every other photograph with nude kids in it?
I can just imagine them saying "It's just art bruh"
- vidarh 10y agoWhat do you mean "like every other photograph with nudge kids in it"? Because most countries do not have laws against photographs with nudge kids in it. Most countries have laws against child porn. Yes, there are difficulties discerning the difference sometimes. This is not one of those cases. In the case of Facebooks specific censorship, the issue is also not that she was a child in the photo, but nudity in general.
- mickmock 10y agoIt's not against the law?????? OMG! Oh wait... did I say anything about it being against the law? Exactly. Facebook does not allow nudity. Get over it.
- vidarh 10y agoYou did however make a point of it being a kid, which under Facebooks rules is irrelevant. And no, I won't get over it - Facebook is now so ingrained in culture and the exchange of ideas that their censorship is becoming a problem.