4 ms·
That might be true but it's irrelevant. I'd have no objection if you left out the introductory clause. http://www.paulgraham.com/disagree.html http://www.paulg
by chasingsparks 17y ago
That might be true but it's irrelevant. I'd have no objection if you left out the introductory clause.
http://www.paulgraham.com/disagree.html http://www.paulgraham.com/disagree.html
- wmf 17y agoActually I'm not disagreeing. I'm saying that you probably don't need to read this (long-winded) article because it simply reiterates a well-known and well-worn position.
- chasingsparks 17y agoSorry. I didn't notice your TLDR tag.