3 ms·
a) Site is down, google cache is here http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:NBcmXVo-izcJ:www.boyter.org/2016/08/gpl-time-bomb-interesting-approac
by burgerdev 10y ago
a) Site is down, google cache is here http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:NBcmXVo-izcJ:www.boyter.org/2016/08/gpl-time-bomb-interesting-approach-foss-licensing/ http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:NBcmXVo...
b) The license file on GitHub does not mention GPL, a time frame or something even remotely related to the post - looks like some sort of shareware license.
c) If it's a good product today, will it still be a good product in 3 years? In today's version? I doubt it.
Still better than just selling binaries, but not by much.
- m3adow 10y ago> b) The license file on GitHub does not mention GPL, a time frame or something even remotely related to the post - looks like some sort of shareware license. The README.txt does: https://github.com/boyter/searchcode-server/blob/master/README.txt https://github.com/boyter/searchcode-server/blob/master/READ...
- lucb1e 10y agoYeah that tripped me up too. The article had no links so I clicked the tweet on top, checked out the license file, saw nothing of the sort, and as a last hope scrolled through the readme. There at last.
- boyter 10y agoSomething for me to fix. I will sort this issue out over the next few days.