3 ms·
> "still have more applicants than jobs" This is true for a lot of companies - but there's only a surplus of labor if the applicants are qualified. For a comp
by potatolicious 10y ago
> "still have more applicants than jobs"
This is true for a lot of companies - but there's only a surplus of labor if the applicants are qualified.
For a company to be able to be frivolous with their process, they'd need to have more qualified applicants than jobs, and I think even for many name-brand BigCorps, this isn't the case.
- vonmoltke 10y agoI suspect most name-brand BigCos (including Google and friends) are pretty bad at first-pass decisions about what applicants are qualified. Has anybody stopped to consider that the root cause of their stream of Terri le interview candidates is a terrible filtering process for deciding who gets interviewed?