3 ms·
You missed the 'er' in riskier. Do you seriously think this is more of a threat than executing binaries you have to reverse engineer to know what they do?
by scrollaway 10y ago
You missed the 'er' in riskier. Do you seriously think this is more of a threat than executing binaries you have to reverse engineer to know what they do?
- MichaelGG 10y agoWell one could argue that having a shell script invites people to review it, then the article's behaviour could change it. So people might trust it when they otherwise wouldn't have. But... they should just download it locally, verify, and run. Whereas for a binary, they might go verify a signature or something more severe.