4 ms·
>Why would it be any different for the "common population"? Because the "common population" does not have half their blood replaced by burning chemicals every
by erelde 10y ago
>Why would it be any different for the "common population"?
Because the "common population" does not have half their blood replaced by burning chemicals every week.
>Fad? It's being around for millennia for.
And for millenia, many people thought the Earth was flat, the age of a belief doesn't validate that belief.
- radiorental 10y agoIntermittent fasting is a well documented & proven phenomena. It also regularly appears in the form of various articles on HN with many proponents here. I don't follow it, I like my food. However, a cursory glance through other comment on this thread may give you cause to rethink your pov.
- castis 10y agoNo one is saying the belief was validated, only that it wasn't a fad.
- mamcx 10y ago>And for millennia, many people thought the Earth was flat, the age of a belief doesn't validate that belief. And dismiss things just because is against your own assumptions is also far older.