3 ms·
>'There must be no classification of people, for example, on the size, age and the like' That's a bit hand-wavy. Meanwhile there's actual research going into
by Cozumel 10y ago
>'There must be no classification of people, for example, on the size, age and the like'
That's a bit hand-wavy.
Meanwhile there's actual research going into this problem
http://moralmachine.mit.edu/ http://moralmachine.mit.edu/
http://news.mit.edu/2016/driverless-cars-safety-issues-0623 http://news.mit.edu/2016/driverless-cars-safety-issues-0623
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trolley_problem https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trolley_problem
- veiko 10y agoYour links describe the problem well. But the article/interview goes beyond this and suggest a possible solution: Treat kids and adults the same, and (maybe, my guess, not in the interview) even ignore the number of people involved when comparing options. The judge Udo Di Fabio that heads this ethics commission is a very outspoken and smart guy, it will be interesting to see how he approaches these questions and "converts" them into actionable law.