3 ms·
The flip side is that sometimes a company can be too "clever" trying to invent something better when they could just copy. For example, Microsoft waffled for y
by redstripe 17y ago
The flip side is that sometimes a company can be too "clever" trying to invent something better when they could just copy.
For example, Microsoft waffled for years before adding tabs to IE. They wanted to find a better way manage multiple pages. I think most people still prefer tabs to their "clever" image thumbnail thing. So all they did was waste a few years not implementing an existing feature that their customers were all asking for.
This blog entry reads like a Malcom Gladwell story with it's selection bias. Innovating in itself is not enough if the features you're spending time on are not going to be a big success. That's why you still need to keep copying successful features from competitors. They've already done most of the hard work.
- elblanco 17y agoLets not forget that one of the secrets to building successful software is the principle of "good enough for now, we'll make it better later."
- ssp 17y agoI think most people still prefer tabs to their "clever" image Tabs is web browsers are evidence of some fundamental brokenness with the web. I think Microsoft's designers probably instinctively hated the idea, just like Apple's probably did (Safari didn't (doesn't?) have tabs turned on by default). It's far from clear to me that most people are comfortable with the concept of dynamically managed tabs. Clearly computer nerds do like them though.