3 ms·
I agree with the premise, that the iPad seems inexpensive because of anchoring, but I completely disagree with the analysis, that the keynote presentation where
by gizmo 17y ago
I agree with the premise, that the iPad seems inexpensive because of anchoring, but I completely disagree with the analysis, that the keynote presentation where the $999 is "crushed" by $499 had anything to do with it.
Fundamentally, people expect the iPad to be expensive because the iPhone was very expensive. Because Macbook Pros are very expensive, and because Macbook Airs are very expensive. Because Apple DVI connectors are expensive, because iPhone headset replacements are expensive. Because basically, everything with an Apple logo costs an arm and a leg.
So when you hear that you can get an iPad for less than twice the cost of an iPod touch then of course, that seems like a really good deal. (And only $100 more than a high-capacity iPod touch.)
The foldable iPad case $40 + keyboard dock $70 + spare charging cable $30 = $140. That's 30% of the iPad right there. So relative to all other Apple products and relative to its accessories an iPad for $500 looks like a steal.
- deleted 17y ago[deleted]
- dabent 17y agoIf I recall, Jobs indicated the $999 price was analysts. I don't have a reference, but that's also the price I'd expected the base model iPad to be. So I think Jobs just took what he saw as everyone's expectation of the anchor, let that sink in for a bit, then "crushed" it with $499.