3 ms·
"Do you regularly hire contractors and then never look over the work they do?" I dont when it comes to software. For say legal services, I dont have many opti
by ahartman00 10y ago
"Do you regularly hire contractors and then never look over the work they do?"
I dont when it comes to software. For say legal services, I dont have many options, as I am not an expert. The point I was trying to make is that sometimes people hire contractors because they dont have the expertise. How are they supposed to review something they dont understand? Saying every organization should have top notch IT on staff so this doesnt happen is hand-waving as well.
- CaptSpify 10y agoThere's a famous saying along the lines of "If you are rich, hire two accountants. One to keep track of your books, and another to keep track of the first guy" If you provide sensitive information to anyone that you don't have legal recourse against, then I don't really have any sympathy for you. If you make a bad business decision and it leaks my info, I'm not upset because someone took it without your approval, I'm upset because it was leaked. There's a cost/benefit risk to everything. If you want to take the route of working with contractors, you have to weight the risks for that as well.
- ahartman00 10y ago"If you are rich, hire two accountants. One to keep track of your books, and another to keep track of the first guy" Brilliant, I hadnt heard of/thought of that. "There's a cost/benefit risk to everything. If you want to take the route of working with contractors, you have to weight the risks for that as well." True, I would just like to point out that hiring your own staff might no work out either...
- CaptSpify 10y agoOh absolutely. The other side isn't necessarily better, it just comes with a different set of risks/costs/benefits. You have to weigh those against each other to see which makes more sense for your situation. But if you take the less safe/secure option, you can't expect much sympathy.