No, image inlining is quite old, and base64 is not a very efficient encoding, although gzip might make up for the ~1/3 increase in size. You'd think HTTP/2 ser

No, image inlining is quite old, and base64 is not a very efficient encoding, although gzip might make up for the ~1/3 increase in size. You'd think HTTP/2 server push would stand for this, but I can imagine inlining is still a bit faster.