3 ms·
Economies of scale. Everyone wanted a high def 16:9 display, so the dyes for 4:3 became too expensive. I also miss my visually perfect 16:10, but alias time mar
by valarauca1 10y ago
Economies of scale. Everyone wanted a high def 16:9 display, so the dyes for 4:3 became too expensive. I also miss my visually perfect 16:10, but alias time marches on.
- Grishnakh 10y agoI completely disagree. I'm sorry, but I find it impossible to believe that enterprise IT departments and businesses were jumping up and down for 16:9 displays. Maybe all the stupid consumers wanted them, but consumers are not the target customer for enterprise laptops. I think it's much more likely that the laptop makers saw an opportunity to save money by going to 16:9 because of the massive growth in 16:9 LCD screens thanks to TVs, because the LCD factories were pushing them for economies of scale.