4 ms·
I don't want a Jaybird so that's not a winning argument for why I would want these. I'm comparing them to my $90 noise cancelling over ear headphones that, whi
by Snowdax 10y ago
I don't want a Jaybird so that's not a winning argument for why I would want these.
I'm comparing them to my $90 noise cancelling over ear headphones that, while yes no exactly top tier, don't require their own charging infrastructure and have much better audio quality than stock apple.
I may as well have an entirely separate MP3 player that costs me a good bit less than $160 than deal with this BS.
- Cookingboy 10y agoJust because you personally don't like wireless headphone doesn't mean Apple's overpricing theirs. Most pure wireless headphones cost more than $150. Are you the target audience? Probably not, but for people who are looking for that type of solution Apple's pricing is very reasonable.
- abvdasker 10y agoMaybe he's suggesting that headphones are headphones and $150 is too much for what is probably a pretty mediocre pair in terms of audio quality and ease of use.