2 ms·
Because it's extremely rare for the reporting quality to be good with the Daily Mail.
by mobiuscog 10y ago
Because it's extremely rare for the reporting quality to be good with the Daily Mail.
- biot 10y agoI can agree with that assessment... they're typically fairly trashy. I've submitted content from them before when it was an AP article (so the text was identical on all sites that carried it) but they had additional relevant, higher resolution images accompanying the text. Got unnecessary flak for it of course.