3 ms·

Original story is from the Siberian Times: http://siberiantimes.com/ecology/casestudy/news/n0681-now-the-proof-permafrost-bubbles-are-leaking-methane-200-times-

• biot 10y ago
  > (the Daily Mail? Seriously?) Reporting quality seems to be good with a lot of images. If the message is good, why criticize the messenger?
  • mobiuscog 10y ago
    Because it's extremely rare for the reporting quality to be good with the Daily Mail.
    • biot 10y ago
      I can agree with that assessment... they're typically fairly trashy. I've submitted content from them before when it was an AP article (so the text was identical on all sites that carried it) but they had additional relevant, higher resolution images accompanying the text. Got unnecessary flak for it of course.
  • denzil_correa 10y ago
    The Signal-Noise Ratio of Daily Mail is six-sigma low. http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Daily_Mail http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Daily_Mail
  • jbg_ 10y ago
    > Reporting quality seems to be good What makes you say that? Like much of the Daily Mail, it seems to be sensationalised in a way that makes understanding the (probably important) content rather difficult. The headline is incredibly misleading, to start with.
• FuNe 10y ago
  Didn't know that's a tabloid. Can't update the link now. Sorry about that. Yet the story is a good one.
• ff10 10y ago
  Beware of the comment section.
  • rjsw 10y ago
    Of the Siberian Times ?