3 ms·
> Such naming is an anti-pattern, of course This is exactly the cultural problem with too strict adherance to OOP :) It's like people saying "nails are anti-p
by ajuc 10y ago
> Such naming is an anti-pattern, of course
This is exactly the cultural problem with too strict adherance to OOP :)
It's like people saying "nails are anti-pattern of course, but people still use them, so we've added hammer-heads to our screwdrivers".
- scott_s 10y agoYes, that was the point I was getting at. It's obviously part of how real Java code is written, but I feel like I'm going against how the language was designed when I do it. (Clearly, everything is not an object, and a class is not always the most appropriate way to group code.)