> What Hoffman's theorem says is the fitness-tuned critter will — almost always — win the evolution game. It doesn't from the explanation in the article at all

> What Hoffman's theorem says is the fitness-tuned critter will — almost always — win the evolution game. It doesn't from the explanation in the article at all. It just states the reality critter can't beat the fitness-tuned critter. Evolution doesn't 'care' if you have extra useless things, you won't lose them evolutionary. (Although if there is a energy or something cost it might 'care' about this negative)