Legal precedent: "Copiepresse (Belgian Newspaper Conglomerate) v. Google (Read more.. ). Filed in August, 2006. Claims: to remove all the content indexed by G

Legal precedent: "Copiepresse (Belgian Newspaper Conglomerate) v. Google (Read more.. ). Filed in August, 2006. Claims: to remove all the content indexed by Google's crawlers on the newspaper's websites." http://www.infoniac.com/offbeat-news/google-list-of-class-action-lawsuits.html http://www.infoniac.com/offbeat-news/google-list-of-class-ac... Google's response: "Of course, if publishers don’t want their websites to appear in search results (most do) the robots.txt standard (something that webmasters understand) enables them to prevent automatically the indexing of their content. It's nearly universally accepted and honoured by all reputable search engines." http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2006/09/about-google-news-case-in-belgium.html http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2006/09/about-google-news-cas... May be you can get Google to file an amicus brief... "Outcome: Google had to remove the plaintiff's newspaper content from its database within 10 days or face fines of 1,000,000 Euro per day. Google had to publish "in a visible and clear manner and without any commentary from her part the entire intervening judgment on the home pages of google.be and of news.google.be for a continuous period of 5 days within 10 days... under penalty of a daily fine of 500,000 Euro per day of delay". Google had was awarded the costs of the expenses of 941.63 Euro (summons) and 121.47 Euro (costs of thy proceedings)."