Yeah I agree with you I didn't find much of anything useful beyond this one other bit that added another, small explanation for moving away from bossless: > Wh

Yeah I agree with you I didn't find much of anything useful beyond this one other bit that added another, small explanation for moving away from bossless: > While the old times created a strong sense of camaraderie, employees didn’t know who to direct questions to, either about uncomfortable confrontations with colleagues or about their own performance. “Without even a minimal layer of management, it was difficult to have some of those conversations and to get people feeling like they understood what was expected of them, and that they were getting the support that they needed in order to do the best work,” No information about what the current structure is, how it's working out compared to the last one nor really any satisfying answers for why the initial bossless failed (I mean I can certainly guess but they went through it, it would be nice to have more data).