5 ms·
Ah, so because I use addons I might not be seeing these benefits for some time? Good to know. Chrome is right now way faster for me, but I prefer using FF so
by nchelluri 10y ago
Ah, so because I use addons I might not be seeing these benefits for some time? Good to know.
Chrome is right now way faster for me, but I prefer using FF so I am in the Mozilla camp right now. Eager to see this rolled out. Early versions of e10s were very fragile and not so usable for me, so I switched it off.
- semicolon_storm 10y agoI use quite a few add-ons and my e10 was disabled because of them. I force enabled e10 using Mozilla's guide https://wiki.mozilla.org/Electrolysis#Force_Enable https://wiki.mozilla.org/Electrolysis#Force_Enable and didn't notice anything breaking (yet).
- nchelluri 10y agothanks, I've turned it on; I'll see how it goes.
- Sylos 10y agoIt's usually less so things breaking and rather just being slow. For example, if you use NoScript, it often takes really long to load up a page, because that's when NoScript becomes active, and because NoScript isn't yet properly e10s-compatible, it just forces Firefox to do things in a single-process way. But that actually makes things slower than when Firefox is running without e10s. about:performance is a rather good indicator, if an add-on is causing slow-downs.