3 ms·
Hammers home the point that the integrity of any journalism is contingent on editing, and context. Yet still I’m glad for the leak - for the first time in mont
by aresant 17y ago
Hammers home the point that the integrity of any journalism is contingent on editing, and context.
Yet still I’m glad for the leak - for the first time in months I heard more discussion and awareness that a war we’re bankrolling is still raging instead of celebrity infididelity.
- deleted 17y ago[deleted]
- deleted 17y ago[deleted]
- ramchip 17y agoProbably because it says nothing but "I agree". It doesn't bring anything to the discussion, hence 0 karma (negative would be overkill, however).
- izendejas 17y agoRe: your second point, here's a good example of what you mean: http://i.imgur.com/NVih0.jpg http://i.imgur.com/NVih0.jpg (via @chrisloos)
- Maktab 17y agoThough just to clarify something, this footage was taken in 2007 at the height of the Iraq War. It's not recent and the war is not still raging, at least not at anything close to the 2007 level. But I agree with your main point. Context is everything, Wikileaks could have handled this better.