4 ms·
I Wouldn't be surprised if the DOD was the biggest customer for both.. "subsidy" doesn't mean they were owned or directly financed.
by genericacct 10y ago
I Wouldn't be surprised if the DOD was the biggest customer for both.. "subsidy" doesn't mean they were owned or directly financed.
- ctrl-j 10y agoOwned? No, it doesn't mean that. Directly financed? I wouldn't call it a subsidy otherwise: https://www.google.com/search?q=subsidy&oq=subsidy https://www.google.com/search?q=subsidy&oq=subsidy
- abz10 10y agoA subsidy can exist in effect when the terms are overly favorable and not at market rate.
- deleted 10y ago[deleted]
- Synaesthesia 10y agoExactly, the biggest research driver is military spending. Procurement is a huge way in which these companies were funded, eg the DOD bought 90% of computers in the 50's and 60's before they became viable as consumer devices in the late 70's.
- Aloha 10y agoPARC never had substantive DOD funding, it was funded by the largess of Xerox. Bell Labs did do government work, but was largely funded by the Bell Operating Companies, in the form of a royalty.