4 ms·
It's more murkey than that. As I understand it, all video that is released by the govenment and army is public domain -- but it is not clear exactly how this v
by dotBen 17y ago
It's more murkey than that. As I understand it, all video that is released by the govenment and army is public domain -- but it is not clear exactly how this video was obtained.
In the website they say that they made a freedom of information request but later say they had to decrypt the video.
That seems to suggest that the video was not released to them under the freedom of information request and instead an encrypted original was obtained by other means not explained.
I doubt any video of recent active combat is going to be declassified and thus available under a FOIR, and if you obtain something illegally/unofficially that doesn't suddenly make it public domain.
(to be clear, I'm glad this video is out there - it is an important story being told. But IMHO the distribution status of the video is a reasonable discussion topic none the less)
- cookiecaper 17y agoAre leaks of classified info usually prosecuted under copyright laws? It seems that they would apply something more severe or specific. It is my understanding that all works of the US gov. are public domain and classified content is protected under secrecy laws, not copyright laws.
- deleted 17y ago[deleted]
- rgejman 17y agoIf they are released, even accidentally, or stolen, they cannot be enjoined. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pentagon_Papers http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pentagon_Papers
- dantheman 17y agoJust a small nitpick, it's not FOIR it's FOIA (Freedom Of Information Act)
- reitzensteinm 17y agoFOIR works as well, referring specifically to the request (Freedom of Information Request).