4 ms·
It is purer than Erlang, has less cruft than Scala, is more practical than Haskell, and in my opinion has a very nice syntax. It is also very fast.
by vegabook 10y ago
It is purer than Erlang, has less cruft than Scala, is more practical than Haskell, and in my opinion has a very nice syntax. It is also very fast.
- reddit_clone 10y ago>It is purer than Erlang Not sure what value of 'pure' you are using here. Erlang has (practically) no mutation to speak of. Thus I would consider that purer. Ocaml on the other hand is as mutating as you want it to be.
- vegabook 10y agoYes I guess I was throwing static typing, somewhat incorrectly, into the "pure" catch-all.