4 ms·
At best its got some real subpar optics, and even being charitable and assuming no ill intent, it looks bumbling and incompetent. Okay. But are those things c
by iamdave 10y ago
At best its got some real subpar optics, and even being charitable and assuming no ill intent, it looks bumbling and incompetent.
Okay.
But are those things criminal? The parent of this chain mentioned the FBI recommending against prosecution, implying criminal acts occurred, so I think this posit is non-ignorable.
- duncan_bayne 10y agoPersonal opinion: they were criminal, and anyone without Clinton's level of political clout would have been vigorously prosecuted. As another example, consider Aaron Schwartz, who was hounded to death by the State (possibly not the FBI?) over Copyright infringement. It boils my blood that seemingly half of the USA want to give Clinton a free pass on this, just because she's on "their side".