4 ms·
I like how they changed "one of us is going to leave the company" to "one of us has to leave" and still treat it like it's a direct quote.
by vito 17y ago
I like how they changed "one of us is going to leave the company" to "one of us has to leave" and still treat it like it's a direct quote.
- pavs 17y agoBy "they" I hope you are referring to Michael Arrington, who likes to call himself a "journalist". He is good at manufacturing news and stroking drama when there is none.
- deleted 17y ago[deleted]
- deleted 17y ago[deleted]
- pavs 17y agohttp://techcrunch.com/2010/01/02/the-tyranny-of-government-and-our-duty-of-confidentiality-as-bloggers/ http://techcrunch.com/2010/01/02/the-tyranny-of-government-a...
- deleted 17y ago[deleted]
- aresant 17y ago100% agree that they are improperly quoting. But the article pretty well supports their title if they removed the quotes.
- nkassis 17y agoActually, one of us could have been anyone. It's a quote out of context.
- dnsworks 17y agoWould you expect anything less sensational from TechCrunch?
- nailer 17y agoI think it would be reasonable to add a filter for sites that are known to submit false info to HN.