4 ms·
Right, the only evidence against him at all seems to be that he lied about logging into his computer remotely, plus the pesticide business which might provide a
by waqf 10y ago
Right, the only evidence against him at all seems to be that he lied about logging into his computer remotely, plus the pesticide business which might provide a motive. I would understand if the insurance company is suspicious, but they just don't have a case.
- iDanoo 10y agoYeah, I don't see much of a motive unless he was on the verge of filing for bankruptcy. But money didn't seem to be an issue..