3 ms·
> It's utterly absurd. Your argument is literally argumentum ad absurdum. You can't show something to be absurd by pointing out that other, hypothetical non-ex
by lobster_johnson 10y ago
> It's utterly absurd.
Your argument is literally argumentum ad absurdum. You can't show something to be absurd by pointing out that other, hypothetical non-existent things are absurd.