4 ms·
cool but me taking that down was because that word itself probably is the wrong one to use, not rewriting history, i tend to agree with Lewis CK in how he says
by sebringj 10y ago
cool but me taking that down was because that word itself probably is the wrong one to use, not rewriting history, i tend to agree with Lewis CK in how he says things as its not taken offensively when in context. I hope people start thinking more like him when it comes to dialog.
- ZoF 10y agoSure, I agree with him too(one of my favorites), changes nothing though. Rewriting what you wrote isn't Rewriting history? Did you not write it? Please explain how you calling Trump a retard was the wrong word? Did you not mean it? How so? Please believe me when I say I will follow up on this. I believe you are socially responsible for your beliefs and you clearly believe being retarded is a bad thing. Please illucidate me, is retardation bad? Would you prefer not to be retarded? You said what you said. If Republicans can't say offensive words you can't say retard without repercussion. That's the future you're working towards, one where your intent doesn't matter, the perceived meaning does. I personally believe we should all be able to be offensive, I think that's how natural growth occurs. Really curious how you defend insulting the mentally handicapped though. Or was that not your intent? Would you find yourself annoyed if people called you a bigot when you're just trying to convey honest belief?