3 ms·
I don't think there's necessarily cognitive dissonance, here. This reading seems internally consistent: While banning certain types of speech may be a necessary
by callahad 10y ago
I don't think there's necessarily cognitive dissonance, here. This reading seems internally consistent: While banning certain types of speech may be a necessary part of creating an inclusive environment, it is not the primary motivation of inclusion, nor always necessary, and thus, inclusion is not about restricting speech.
- prodigal_erik 10y agoChernobyl was about generating power, but that was completely dwarfed by the most enduring consequence. Including a handful of absurdly sensitive people does not justify policing everyone's ideas.