4 ms·

Good job, you're really convincing people.

by ZoF 10y ago

sebringj 10y ago
Well, I think Crockford is a standup guy and probably went to far with the Trump thing and the name calling but whatever. Sometimes you get passionate about a topic, it is what it is.
- ZoF 10y ago
  Sure, it is what it is. Consider backing up your denigration with facts next time; people aren't stupid, we can rationally analyze things. Also 'the trump thing' and 'the name calling' are the same thing. You called him a retard because you find him offensive; don't try to rewrite history. You changing your story now doesn't change the fact that you've insulted the mentally handicapped by painting them as something you perceive as negative; should I contact your previous/future employers about this?(I see you're a founder I guess I'd contact you :)) All of the above is why people are fed up with the 'left'. You can cross the line and say, 'lel I just went too far'; people with the opposite viewpoint? 'Racist bigot white male fire them now' Stay passionate Seb, hope you prove them wrong.
  - sebringj 10y ago
    Thankfully, this threading depth only goes so far which perfectly coincides with my interest in responding.
    - deleted 10y ago
      [deleted]
    - deleted 10y ago
      [deleted]
    - ZoF 10y ago
      Cool. Your displayed intellect also trends towards where my interest is heading. Which would be none at all. Don't slip.
  - sebringj 10y ago
    cool but me taking that down was because that word itself probably is the wrong one to use, not rewriting history, i tend to agree with Lewis CK in how he says things as its not taken offensively when in context. I hope people start thinking more like him when it comes to dialog.
    - ZoF 10y ago
      Sure, I agree with him too(one of my favorites), changes nothing though. Rewriting what you wrote isn't Rewriting history? Did you not write it? Please explain how you calling Trump a retard was the wrong word? Did you not mean it? How so? Please believe me when I say I will follow up on this. I believe you are socially responsible for your beliefs and you clearly believe being retarded is a bad thing. Please illucidate me, is retardation bad? Would you prefer not to be retarded? You said what you said. If Republicans can't say offensive words you can't say retard without repercussion. That's the future you're working towards, one where your intent doesn't matter, the perceived meaning does. I personally believe we should all be able to be offensive, I think that's how natural growth occurs. Really curious how you defend insulting the mentally handicapped though. Or was that not your intent? Would you find yourself annoyed if people called you a bigot when you're just trying to convey honest belief?
  - sebringj 10y ago
    stay anonymous
    - ZoF 10y ago
      I will. Stay dox-able friend. This is the game; good to see you learning the rules.

Good job, you're really convincing people.

by ZoF 10y ago

Good job, you're really convincing people.

Well, I think Crockford is a standup guy and probably went to far with the Trump thing and the name calling but whatever. Sometimes you get passionate about a topic, it is what it is.

ZoF 10y ago
Sure, it is what it is. Consider backing up your denigration with facts next time; people aren't stupid, we can rationally analyze things. Also 'the trump thing' and 'the name calling' are the same thing. You called him a retard because you find him offensive; don't try to rewrite history. You changing your story now doesn't change the fact that you've insulted the mentally handicapped by painting them as something you perceive as negative; should I contact your previous/future employers about this?(I see you're a founder I guess I'd contact you :)) All of the above is why people are fed up with the 'left'. You can cross the line and say, 'lel I just went too far'; people with the opposite viewpoint? 'Racist bigot white male fire them now' Stay passionate Seb, hope you prove them wrong.
- sebringj 10y ago
  Thankfully, this threading depth only goes so far which perfectly coincides with my interest in responding.
  - deleted 10y ago
    [deleted]
  - deleted 10y ago
    [deleted]
  - ZoF 10y ago
    Cool. Your displayed intellect also trends towards where my interest is heading. Which would be none at all. Don't slip.
- sebringj 10y ago
  cool but me taking that down was because that word itself probably is the wrong one to use, not rewriting history, i tend to agree with Lewis CK in how he says things as its not taken offensively when in context. I hope people start thinking more like him when it comes to dialog.
  - ZoF 10y ago
    Sure, I agree with him too(one of my favorites), changes nothing though. Rewriting what you wrote isn't Rewriting history? Did you not write it? Please explain how you calling Trump a retard was the wrong word? Did you not mean it? How so? Please believe me when I say I will follow up on this. I believe you are socially responsible for your beliefs and you clearly believe being retarded is a bad thing. Please illucidate me, is retardation bad? Would you prefer not to be retarded? You said what you said. If Republicans can't say offensive words you can't say retard without repercussion. That's the future you're working towards, one where your intent doesn't matter, the perceived meaning does. I personally believe we should all be able to be offensive, I think that's how natural growth occurs. Really curious how you defend insulting the mentally handicapped though. Or was that not your intent? Would you find yourself annoyed if people called you a bigot when you're just trying to convey honest belief?
- sebringj 10y ago
  stay anonymous
  - ZoF 10y ago
    I will. Stay dox-able friend. This is the game; good to see you learning the rules.