> Sure, what is required is for the constituency to actually be inclusive of those not in the in-group. That does not make sense. Seriously how is this not do

> Sure, what is required is for the constituency to actually be inclusive of those not in the in-group. That does not make sense. Seriously how is this not doublethink? There exist no political groups representing interests outside of the political group, it is a straight contradiction in terms. > Examples like [1], combined with a lack of interest by the candidate or his followers in correcting the situation make historical analogies seem prescient. These characters and the things they say are the obsessions of the media and I don't share their enthusiasm. Nothing they say or do in ten, twenty years has any substance. It is demotic theatrics that distract us from anything that actually matters. Like how we're continuing to plateau economically or the dire need of our government institutions to be reformed.