4 ms·
In terms of judging if the police committed a crime, it's sufficiently clear cut, the standard comes down in favor of the (potential) defendant's side when if i
by hga 10y ago
In terms of judging if the police committed a crime, it's sufficiently clear cut, the standard comes down in favor of the (potential) defendant's side when if it's not "conclusive" like you and some of the experts claim.
Assuming, of course, their testimony was credible, sufficiently consistent, etc.
And my memory error wasn't "from the press release", but from the fact that he was pointing it at people prior to the police showing up.
- soneil 10y agoOh totally agree that the video isn't enough to find anyone guilty (it doesn't pass "reasonable doubt"). But the question here was whether it even deserved a trial. And they argued the video was conclusive enough that a trial wasn't warranted. And that I'm less comfortable with, personally.