4 ms·
ClausIE: Clause-Based Open Information Extraction
- aoldoni 10y agoPaper at https://people.mpi-inf.mpg.de/~rgemulla/publications/delcorro13clausie.pdf https://people.mpi-inf.mpg.de/~rgemulla/publications/delcorr...
- brudgers 10y agoClausie homepage: https://www.mpi-inf.mpg.de/departments/databases-and-information-systems/software/clausie/ https://www.mpi-inf.mpg.de/departments/databases-and-informa...
- nl 10y agoA while ago, I tested Stanford's Core NLP Open IE implementation and UW (now AllenAII)'s version[1]. The UW version was much better. The paper for this make it look pretty good compared to that. I'll be trying it. [1] https://github.com/allenai/openie-standalone https://github.com/allenai/openie-standalone
- vmorgulis 10y agoI found a Stanford Parser jar file in the sources of ClauseIE. http://nlp.stanford.edu:8080/parser/index.jsp http://nlp.stanford.edu:8080/parser/index.jsp
- jhzab 10y agoI came to the same conclusion. OTOH OpenIE is around 4x slower than CoreNLP and the memory requirements can also be a problem (~4GB JVM heap space). I would be really interested on how ClausIE stacks up to that. ClausIE also seems to be using CoreNLP _and_ OpenNLP.