5 ms·
But, why was she moving any State-related content off government computers? Why would she put herself and others at risk like that? These weren't all personal
by EdSharkey 10y ago
But, why was she moving any State-related content off government computers? Why would she put herself and others at risk like that? These weren't all personal emails she was sending - she was discussing State department business with the foundation and with her trusted operator, Sidney Blumenthal.
Worst of all is how sloppy everyone involved in this fiasco has been. I feel bad for Obama, what a cluster!
> Also remember the official state server at the time was also confirmed hacked.
Look, clearly Hillary engaged in unsafe IT practices. Could it be she was phished? Maybe she was the one who enabled the hack!
- ascagnel_ 10y agoSimple: the NSA refused to give Clinton the same secure BlackBerry setup they had provided President Obama.
- EdSharkey 10y agoHas she claimed this anywhere in testimony? The reason I heard given was she needed a way to send emails of a personal nature. That reason and the one you've given sound like a dodge. Fact is, if she even tangentially admitted to knowingly transmitting information _marked_ confidential off State networks (which she did), she'd be guilty of multiple crimes and none of her friends could save her. She would be frog-marched off to the hoosegow. Hence, the endless excuses, waving-off, and feigned ignorance. The drip, drip, drip of damning evidence will continue and to save her skin all she can do is shrug absent-mindedly.