3 ms·
Here's what the FBI report (https://assets.documentcloud.org/documents/3039030/Hillary-Clinton-FBI-Investigation.pdf https://assets.documentcloud.org/documents/
by jrmg 10y ago
Here's what the FBI report (https://assets.documentcloud.org/documents/3039030/Hillary-Clinton-FBI-Investigation.pdf https://assets.documentcloud.org/documents/3039030/Hillary-C...) actually says:
The FBI identified three e-mail chain, encompassing eight individual e-mail exchanges to or from Clinton's personal e-mail accounts, which contained at least one paragraph marked "(C)," a marking ostensibly indicating the presence of information classified at the CONFIDENTIAL level. The emails contained no additional markings, such as a header or footer, indicating that they were classified. State confirmed through the FOIA review process that one of these three e-mail chains contains information which is currently classified at the CONFIDENTIAL level. State determined that the other two e-mail chains are currently UNCLASSIFIED. State did not provide a determination as to whether any of these three e-mails were classified at the time they were sent.
When asked about the e-mail chain containing "C" portion markings that State determined to currently contain CONFIDENTIAL information, Clinton stated she did not know what the "(C)" means at the beginning of the paragraphs and speculated it was referencing paragraphs marked in alphabetical order. Clinton identified tied a "CONFIDENTIAL" header and footer (inserted in the document by the FBI prior to the interview) and asked if the "(C)" related to the "CONFIDENTIAL" header and footer. Clinton did not believe the content of the e-mail was classified and questioned the classification determination. When asked of her knowledge regarding TOP SECRET, SECTET, and CONFIDENTIAL classification levels of USG information, Clinton responded that she did not pay attention to the "level" of classification and took all classified information seriously.
- djur 10y agoThank you. Gizmodo's article is grossly misleading, starting with its 100% inaccurate title ("C" doesn't stand for "classified"). This makes their terrible "Facebook is censoring conservatives" story look like Pulitzer material.