3 ms·
"It's best to think of Linux as a professional utility." I guess it fits into that box. I use OSX as my desktop at home, but I would 100% go with some Linux b
by pfranz 10y ago
"It's best to think of Linux as a professional utility." I guess it fits into that box. I use OSX as my desktop at home, but I would 100% go with some Linux before going back to Windows at home. I switched to a Windows job after using Linux for 10years--I really miss using Linux. At first I thought it was a familiarity thing and dove all into powershell and the like, but I the solutions for Windows seems awkward, slow, and clunky.
We're probably getting very different "value adds" from Windows vs Linux. I liked Visual Studios' debugger, but I mostly compile other's code (libraries) and write glue-code in things like Python or munge data via the command line. I abhor editors that take 5+ seconds to launch (vi generally loads in much less than 1 second) and using command line tools to compile means I can script and chain things together, or easily run them on a remote computer.
As for desktop use at home, I mostly use Internet, Word processor, spreadsheets, and tinker. OSX and google docs fits most of those use-cases.
- fsloth 10y ago"We're probably getting very different "value adds" from Windows vs Linux." This. The spectrum of computer uses is so wide that the only obviously wrong statement is to claim a specific system will undoubtedly fit all users needs. I am personally responsible for several small DLL C++ projects at work and have visual studio solutions open to them all of the time so start up time is not something I care about. So, for me the OS mostly fades into the background. Grepping through filedirectories is essential for my work. Windows vanilla tools generally suck for this but one fixes that by using a third party exe - in this instance, AgentRansack. I agree, I would much rather use bash and posix tools for the sort of problems that those are used than what is available on vanilla windows.