This makes perfect sense to me. If the government is required to present a warrant in order to enter a home and seize a computer to search for files, why should

This makes perfect sense to me. If the government is required to present a warrant in order to enter a home and seize a computer to search for files, why should they be able to ignore the Constitution when it comes to data stored in the cloud? I like the analogy to safety deposit boxes quoted in the article. Cloud storage has a lot of parallels when you think about it. Current data collection practices would then be comparable to the government going into a bank and looking inside the contents of every safety deposit box. All while not informing any of the bank's customers and putting a gag order on the bank from doing so.