Good point. Some other research papers that use tablets and e-ink readers found no significant learning benefit as compared to paper: http://digitalcommons.bro

Good point. Some other research papers that use tablets and e-ink readers found no significant learning benefit as compared to paper: http://digitalcommons.brockport.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1026&context=drakepubs http://digitalcommons.brockport.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?arti... http://go.galegroup.com/ps/anonymous?id=GALE%7CA289721760&sid=googleScholar&v=2.1&it=r&linkaccess=fulltext&issn=00921815&p=AONE&sw=w&authCount=1&isAnonymousEntry=true http://go.galegroup.com/ps/anonymous?id=GALE%7CA289721760&si... http://search.proquest.com/openview/f98bc7b7d8194ba66b948d946784e42b/1?pq-origsite=gscholar http://search.proquest.com/openview/f98bc7b7d8194ba66b948d94... (Found after a quick Google Scholar search, there's probably a lot more material out there.) Although I still think eReaders are more limited than physical books as far as sensory input is concerned, it appears that the difference is small enough not to make a serious dent on learning.