3 ms·
I think not having explicit support for proxies in HTTPs is a fundamental design mistake, so seeing how you’re keen on putting me in a camp, I’d like to volunte
by deno 10y ago
I think not having explicit support for proxies in HTTPs is a fundamental design mistake, so seeing how you’re keen on putting me in a camp, I’d like to volunteer for that one.
The term MITM is appropriate because it shows the whole thing is a charade. If handing off secret keys to third parties with absolutely no transparency past the first hop is the standard modus operandi then the entire protocol is a big fat joke. The only purpose, as far as I can tell, is to further centralize the web. First it was ICANN with domain registration, now it’s certificate authorities. Soon you’ll need a special permission from government to host a website.
HTTP(s) needs to be burned to the ground and replaced with something better. Liberty and freedom are at stake. How’s that for FUD.