SpaceX is hardly green, I would imagine. That doesn't change the realities of what they're up to. I don't support the green label on solar panels that are only

SpaceX is hardly green, I would imagine. That doesn't change the realities of what they're up to. I don't support the green label on solar panels that are only profitable because of government dole. However, I still believe the methodology for determining risk (internal to SolarCity) to be sufficiently safe (for me to invest). I'm familiar with what they're up to, though. Could it be the case that a 6.5% rate reflects the risk, but also the difficulty of securing operating funds. e.g. a sweetened deal for those willing to support them. I'm interested in finance, but not a financier... so, my opinion could benefit from correction.