>Is there a reason they didn't tax non-use? The "foreigner exclusion" sounds like fighting a symptom. The cynical answer to this by the way is that there's a P

>Is there a reason they didn't tax non-use? The "foreigner exclusion" sounds like fighting a symptom. The cynical answer to this by the way is that there's a Provincial election in early 2017, so in the near term appearing to address the problem is more important than addressing the problem in an effective way.