> it's not necessarily enough grounds to use the power and resources of the state to actively ban a substance It's not enough grounds because the cost of enfor

> it's not necessarily enough grounds to use the power and resources of the state to actively ban a substance It's not enough grounds because the cost of enforcement is so high that it is equal to or surpasses the cost of the drugs themselves. That isn't the case with antibiotic soap--it's not an addictive productive, so it's unlikely that there will be dealers slinging triclosan on street corners.