4 ms·
This looks neat, nice code, but isn't this just the same stuff that xv (1) has been doing since the 90's? It sure looks similar. Maybe this is much faster? (
by luckydude 10y ago
This looks neat, nice code, but isn't this just the same stuff that xv (1) has been doing since the 90's? It sure looks similar. Maybe this is much faster?
(1) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Xv_(software) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Xv_(software)
- amzans 10y agoThe project was originally for learning purposes, as I wanted to try out Go's concurrency/parallelism for something not web related. It quickly grew into a collection of common image processing functions, so I decided to turn it into a Go package. The goal of the library is ease of use and development instead of being the fastest implementation (and then loosing too much readability). That being said, it is not slow but there's still room for improvement, which will be addressed during the optimisation and bug fixing stage. I'm not sure if it's the same as xv, to be honest I haven't worked with it before. But it looks interesting, thanks for the link!