3 ms·
I think it would be solved by requiring a comment with each downvote. The motivations for an upvote are obvious but a downvote should have to explain why, even
by rm_-rf_slash 10y ago
I think it would be solved by requiring a comment with each downvote. The motivations for an upvote are obvious but a downvote should have to explain why, even if it something as simple as "citation needed" or "factually incorrect, here's why."
I often get the sense that anonymous and unexplained downvotes carry a sense of "this post is so obviously wrong it defies the need for explanation," which means that nobody learns anything from the exchange.
EDIT: I got downvoted for this comment and I have no idea why
- eevilspock 10y agoThat would result in too many redundant comments. Many people will down-vote for exactly the same reason. Though I do wish HN could distinguish between "I subjectively don't like or disagree with your point" and "Your logic is objectively flawed or rests on false data".
- DanBC 10y ago> Though I do wish HN could distinguish between "I subjectively don't like or disagree with your point" and "Your logic is objectively flawed or rests on false data". We never hear complaints about people not distinguishing between "I subjectively like or agree with your point" and "Your logic is objectively sound or rests on good data".
- cookiecaper 10y agoHow can HN distinguish when even its users cannot? "Objectivity" is so subjective.
- swsieber 10y agoDevil's Advocate: HN could then create a special category of comment - the downvote comment. Upvoting a downvote comment would downvote the parent, thus grouping similar sentiment. I agree with you though, on both points.
- smsm42 10y ago> I do wish HN could distinguish between "I subjectively don't like or disagree with your point" and "Your logic is objectively flawed or rests on false data". I would like having strong AI driving HN too. Because humans are very bad at distinguishing those two and confuse them all the time. Once we invent the AI that allows people to separate them I'd be all for using it here on HN.
- deleted 10y ago[deleted]
- krapp 10y agoIn that case, it seems to me all of the value lies in the comment, and none in the downvote.
- devinhelton 10y agoI agree, but I think the comment should be a private message, seen by only the commenter (and perhaps the mods). I don't like seeing a comment thread cluttered up by debates about whether a comment deserves down votes.
- rm_-rf_slash 10y ago1: Presumably, people won't post redundant downvote comments. One or two tends to get the point across. 2: You can still collapse threads.